Residential Spaces Precedence Over Community Amenities: The Controversy Surrounding Planning Approvals Leaving Residents Without Essential Services
=====================================================================================
In the rapidly evolving landscape of England's property development, a common issue persists: the mismatch between the pace of housing delivery and the availability of essential services in newly built or expanding settlements. This discord is evident in the experiences of residents in places like Northstowe, Cambridgeshire, and Westvale Park, Horley.
Northstowe, a town planned since the 2000s and intended to host up to 10,000 homes, is currently devoid of shops, cafes, or GP surgeries. Despite being designed to include such facilities, they have yet to materialise. Similarly, Westvale Park, approved in 2014, was meant to boast a GP surgery, community hall, and connecting road, but these amenities remain unprovided.
The reasons for this infrastructure lag are complex, but phased planning permissions, developer obligations, and enforcement gaps are key contributors. Phased planning can lead to a staggered development process, with housing completion outpacing the provision of essential services. This is evident in the cases of Northstowe and Westvale Park, where services lag behind housing development.
Developer obligations, often secured through Section 106 agreements, legally bind developers to provide or fund infrastructure linked to their developments. However, enforcement gaps and delays in triggering these obligations can slow infrastructure delivery. In Westvale Park, a stop notice and financial bonds were required to push the completion of outstanding facilities.
The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is a financial charge local authorities may impose on new developments, calculated per square meter, to fund infrastructure supporting growth broadly. CIL provides greater flexibility and a more predictable funding stream than individual developer obligations but is subject to local authority decisions on charging and spending priorities. While CIL supplements funding for community infrastructure, it does not always guarantee simultaneous delivery of services aligned precisely with housing phases.
The Planning Inspectorate and government efforts aim to expedite local plan coverage and infrastructure delivery, which is crucial to addressing these timing issues. In Cambourne, Cambridgeshire, for instance, the council is currently reviewing revised planning applications to address the gaps in the town's infrastructure.
Not all stories are bleak, though. The development of Conningbrook, Kent, demonstrates how planned phasing can match housing delivery effectively. The development of 725 homes includes new wetlands, a primary school, village green, a community building, and open space as conditions of occupation.
The cases of Cambourne and Conningbrook show how these factors can significantly influence whether essential facilities are delivered in time. In both instances, councils have resorted to issuing stop notices and requiring bonds to ensure that developers complete necessary infrastructure in a timely manner.
Residents' frustrations are palpable. One Northstowe resident described the town as feeling "built without a kitchen," reflecting widespread frustration among the residents. Local news sources have reported on residents' frustrations over the absence of key facilities like a post office, newsagent, or bus services in Cambourne.
As England continues to grow and develop, addressing these infrastructure issues will be crucial to creating thriving, complete communities for its residents.
- To effectively address the infrastructure issues in newly built or expanding settlements like Northstowe and Westvale Park, the pace of housing delivery must align with the provision of essential services such as shops, GP surgeries, and cafes.
- A guide for developers could be designed to ensure that planning permissions are issued in a manner that considers the timely delivery of essential services, rather than relying on phased development processes.
- In the landscape of England's property development, the design of communities should prioritize the inclusion of essential facilities like kitchens, grocery stores, and community centers for residents' convenience and overall lifestyle.
- To create a holistic living environment, future home development plans should not only consider housing but also take into account the need for amenities such as food-and-drink establishments, home-and-garden stores, and fashion-and-beauty outlets.
- Alongside housing, the development of facilities for pets, parks, and recreational spaces will contribute to fostering strong relationships among residents, making communities more enjoyable and livable.
- To accommodate the varied lifestyles of residents and ensure their overall satisfaction, developers should consider the need for travel-related facilities like public transportation systems, car parks, and bike lanes.
- In the process of home-building, it is essential to prioritize the provision of necessary community facilities, such as GP surgeries and schools, to foster a sense of belonging and belonging among residents and create a thriving community.
